Voids, reversals, and refunds
Three ways to undo a payment. The customer ends up in the same place; you do not. Picking the right one is probably the highest-value thing a support team can learn about payments.
What separates them
| Authorization reversal | Void | Refund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Undoes | An unused hold | A captured transaction, before it clears | A settled transaction |
| Available | While authorized, not captured | After capture, before batch close | After the batch closes |
| Money | Never moved | Claimed, then the claim withdrawn | Moved out, then moved back |
| Cost | Minimal | Minimal, and usually avoids interchange | A new transaction with its own fees, and you may not get the original interchange back |
| Customer sees | The hold disappears | The pending charge disappears | A charge, then a credit days later |
Reverse if you can. Void if you must. Refund if it is too late.
Choosing
Check the state of the transaction. Then use the matching operation.
- If you did not capture the transaction, send an authorization reversal.
- If you captured the transaction and the batch is open, send a void.
- If the batch closed, send a refund.
Check the batch cut-off time, not the calendar date. A transaction captured yesterday evening can still be in an open batch. Capture explains the batch and its cut-off.
Reversals, and why the deadline is real
A reversal tells the issuer to release a hold. Send one whenever a sale falls through, whenever a timeout leaves you unsure, and whenever the final amount comes in under the estimate.
If you do not, the hold sits there until the issuer times it out on its own schedule. The customer cannot tell that apart from being charged, and they will contact support about it. That contact costs more than the sale.
There is also a direct charge. Visa's misuse of authorization fee applies to any approved authorization that cannot be matched to a settled transaction or a reversal, at roughly nine to fifteen cents each depending on the schedule your processor publishes. At volume, an application that never reverses abandoned holds is quietly paying a tax.
Send the reversal as soon as you know the sale will not complete.
- Card-present transaction, cancelled or sent in error: send the reversal within 24 hours.
- Card-not-present transaction: send the reversal within 72 hours.
- Estimated authorization where the final amount is lower: reverse the unused part within 24 hours of completing the transaction.
Confirm the current deadlines with your acquirer. Visa publishes them and they change.
Voids
A void cancels a captured transaction before it reaches clearing, which in practice means before the batch closes. The transaction never gets to the network, so it usually avoids interchange, and the customer's pending charge just vanishes rather than sitting next to a credit for a week.
The whole value of a void lives inside that window. Same-day cancellations should be voids. This is why cancellation logic has to know when the batch closes rather than just what day it is.
Refunds
A refund is a new transaction going the other way, referencing the original. It settles on its own timetable, so the customer typically waits several business days after you press the button. That wait is at their issuer and your support team cannot shorten it.
The fee question is where people get it wrong, including me in an earlier draft of this page. The networks generally do return most of the interchange to the acquirer when you refund. Whether any of it reaches you is a matter of your provider's policy and your pricing model. Interchange-plus arrangements often pass the credit back. The large flat-rate aggregators state in their published terms that processing fees are not returned on a refund. Some providers keep the interchange and charge you again for the refund transaction.
So "do we get our fees back on refunds" is a question for your contract, not for the scheme rules. It is worth knowing the answer before you model the cost of a generous returns policy.
Two more things that bite:
Refunds net against your funding. A day with more refunds than sales produces a negative net position, and the processor recovers it from later batches or by debiting your account.
Refunds go back to the original payment method. Sending money somewhere else is a money-laundering control problem before it is a scheme rule problem, which is also why a blind refund — a credit with no matching original sale — is restricted and monitored.
Where chargebacks sit
A chargeback is not one of these three. The cardholder starts it through their issuer, it runs on the scheme's timetable rather than yours, and it arrives with a fee whoever turns out to be right. Disputes and chargebacks covers the whole flow.
The practical link is that refunds prevent chargebacks. A customer who cannot get their money from you will ask their bank instead. That path costs more and adds to the chargeback ratio your acquirer watches when it sets your reserve.
Terms introduced
- Authorization reversal — releasing an unused hold.
- Void — cancelling a captured transaction before clearing.
- Refund — a new opposite-direction transaction after settlement.
- Blind refund — a credit with no matching original transaction.
- Misuse of authorization fee — Visa's charge for an authorization that is neither settled nor reversed.
- Chargeback ratio — disputed transactions as a share of volume.