Timing, end to end
Scheme deadlines on this page are published rules and are linked. Funding times are typical ranges and depend on your contract, so treat those as shape rather than fact.
The whole path
Step by step
| Step | Typical elapsed | Who controls it |
|---|---|---|
| Authorization request and response | Under a second | Network and issuer |
| Hold appears on the cardholder's account | Immediately, or a few minutes | Issuer |
| Capture | Seconds if card present, days if you ship first | You |
| Batch close | The daily cut-off | Your processor |
| Clearing submitted and priced | Overnight after batch close | Acquirer and network |
| Settlement between issuer and acquirer | Usually the next banking day | Network |
| Funding to your bank account | Commonly one to three banking days after batch close | Your contract |
| Refund visible to the cardholder | Several business days after you issue it | Issuer |
| Chargeback arrives | Days to months later | Cardholder and issuer |
Deadlines you do not set
These come from the schemes, not from your processor, and missing them costs money or loses a case.
| Deadline | Limit | Where it is set out |
|---|---|---|
| Authorization to clearing, both schemes, every transaction type | 5 to 30 calendar days depending on scheme, channel and category | Authorization |
| Fuel dispenser preauthorization: completion or reversal | 2 hours | Authorization |
| Reversal after a cancelled card-present sale | 24 hours | Voids, reversals, and refunds |
| Reversal, card-not-present | 72 hours | Voids, reversals, and refunds |
| Cardholder window to file a chargeback | Commonly 120 days, longer for some reason codes | Disputes |
| Merchant window to respond to a dispute | Around 30 days for Visa, 45 for Mastercard, often compressed further by the processor's own portal | Disputes |
| ACH return, most codes | 2 banking days | ACH |
| ACH return, unauthorized consumer debit | 60 calendar days | ACH |
The capture deadlines are deliberately not itemised here. They vary by scheme, by channel and by merchant category, the two schemes count differently, and keeping a second copy in step with the first is how a table goes stale. The full breakdown and the source documents are on the authorization page.
Two things that explain most surprises
T is the batch close, not the purchase. Funding schedules get quoted as T+1 or T+2, and T is the day the batch closed. A purchase made after the cut-off belongs to tomorrow's batch and funds a day later than the receipt would suggest.
Banking days are not calendar days. Nothing settles at weekends or on bank holidays. On a T+2 schedule with an evening cut-off:
| Purchase | Batch closes | Funds arrive |
|---|---|---|
| Tuesday morning | Tuesday evening | Thursday |
| Friday morning | Friday evening | Tuesday |
| Friday, after cut-off | Monday evening | Wednesday |
Same product, same price, five days apart. Normal, and not a fault.
When money is late
Roughly in order of how often it turns out to be the answer:
- The batch never closed.
- Capture never ran, because the order shipped but nothing triggered it.
- A bank holiday nobody accounted for.
- A funding hold or a reserve.
- Bank details wrong, so the payout came back.
- More refunds than sales in the period, so there was nothing to fund.
Only one of those is a failure in the payments chain. Most missing money is an operational step that did not happen.
Cards and ACH have opposite shapes
Cards tell you at authorization whether the payment worked. ACH tells you days later, by not coming back. The two rails therefore need opposite designs: a card system can treat silence as success, and an ACH system cannot.
An ACH debit that has not returned is not the same as an ACH debit that succeeded. Systems built on card assumptions get this wrong and it costs real money.
The full comparison — cost, failure timing, reversal windows and whether a reversal can be contested — is on the ACH page, alongside the return codes that drive it. Cards covers the other side.
Talking to customers
Use the answer that matches what the customer describes.
- A pending charge that disappeared: this was an authorization and it has been released. No money was taken.
- A refund that has not arrived: we sent it on the day we issued it. The remaining wait is at your bank.
- A charge that appears twice: one is the real charge, one is a hold that has not dropped yet. Give the customer a date by which it will drop.
Do not promise to speed up a refund. You cannot.
Terms introduced
- T+n — funding counted in banking days from batch close, not from purchase.
- Banking day — a day the settlement system runs. Not weekends or holidays.
- Negative net position — a period where refunds and chargebacks exceed sales.